ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2025
Management of Cervical Spinal Fractures With Ankylosing Spondylitis by Single-Anterior Surgery: A Case Series Report and Literature Review.
Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSurgical management of cervical spinal fractures accompanying ankylosing spondylitis (ASCSF) is intractable in clinical practice. There is still debate about whether surgery by a single-anterior approach is enough for treating ASCSF. The purpose of this study is to summarize and share relevant experience and lessons from both our team and the literature.
methodsPatients referred to our center for ASCSF following single-anterior surgery (from January 2008 to December 2020) were distinguished and enrolled. In addition, literature published from 2000 to 2021 on PubMed and Web of Science databases was systematically reviewed.
resultsA total of 63 patients (7 from our center and 56 from the literature) who underwent single-anterior surgery for treating ASCSF were brought into this study. The average follow-up time of patients in our center is 44 months. The average age of all patients was 58.6. C6/7 was the most commonly injured level (22 patients, 34.9%), and 44 patients (69.8%) experienced neurological impairment at admission. Most ASCSF patients have lordotic cervical alignment and minimal displacement of the fracture. A total of 8 patients died at an early stage after surgery. Apart from these 8 cases, the incidence rates of general complications and surgical complications were relatively 10.9% and 20.0% respectively. The incidence analysis revealed pneumonia (5.45%) as the predominant general complication, contrasting with implant failure (14.55%), which emerged as the most common surgical complication. Among the 8 cases (14.55%) demonstrating implant failure, radiographic analysis revealed preserved cervical lordosis in 4 patients (50%), kyphotic deformity in 1 patient (12.5%), while cervical alignment data were unavailable for the remaining 3 cases (37.5%). Moreover, 29 patients (52.7%) achieved improvement, and 18 patients (37.5%) maintained stable neurological function.
conclusionsFor most ASCSF patients with preserved lordotic alignment and minimal displacement, a single anterior surgery can achieve significant neurological improvement and result in a relatively lower incidence of complications. This provides a good basis for orthopedic physicians to handle cervical spine trauma patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.