Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198196›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Aspirin to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with community-acquired pneumonia or influenza (ASCAP study): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Vahram Hovsepjan, Abel Thijs, Jeske J K van Diemen, Johannes A Bogaards, Michiel M Winter, Judith E Bosmans, Jan M Prins, ASCAP study group

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vahram HovsepjanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands v.hovsepjan@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2317-6645
Abel ThijsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeske J K van DiemenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes A BogaardsDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-5141
Michiel M WinterDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith E BosmansAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan M PrinsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
ASCAP study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiovascular events (CVEs), in particular acute coronary syndrome (ACS), complicate the course of a significant number of patients hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or influenza. Emerging evidence suggests that this increased risk of CVEs could be mitigated by the use of acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin). The ASCAP study investigates whether the addition of aspirin to standard therapy in hospitalised patients with moderate-to-severe CAP or influenza can reduce the incidence of CVEs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ASCAP study is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial in 16 university and general hospitals in the Netherlands, in which patients are randomised to acetylsalicylic acid or matching placebo for 90 days. Eligible patients are adults hospitalised for moderate-to-severe CAP or influenza. Patients with antithrombotic or anticoagulant drugs, or those with contraindications for aspirin, are excluded. The primary outcome is the incidence of ACS up to day 180. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events up to day 180, as well as the incidence of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events up to day 90, all-cause mortality up to day 180 and quality of life and societal costs up to day 180. Survival time will be analysed by the log-rank test, stratified for CAP and influenza, with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Assuming an average baseline ACS risk of 7.5% over 180 days with up to 30% variation across strata, and a 60% hazard reduction due to aspirin, the required sample size to achieve 80% power is 760 patients. Currently, 114 patients are enrolled in the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Amsterdam UMC (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) under reference number 2023.0741 and registered under EU trial number 2023-504553-12-01 in the EU portal CTIS (Clinical Trials Information System). Results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EU CTIS: 2023-504553-12-01.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAspirinCardiovascular DiseasesCommunity-Acquired InfectionsInfluenza, HumanPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPneumoniaCommunity-Acquired PneumoniaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAspirinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsCardiovascular DiseaseINFECTIOUS DISEASESMyocardial infarctionRandomized Controlled TrialRespiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID41198196
PMCPMC12593501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.