Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198192›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Determining the contexts and mechanisms that optimise adoption, offer, uptake and return of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in the primary care pathway in England, UK, for patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC): a realist synthesis.

Julia Margaret Emery, Joanne R Morling, Stephen Timmons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia Margaret EmeryLifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK julia.emery@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8844-181X
Joanne R MorlingLifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-2893
Stephen TimmonsNottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct a synthesis of existing empirical and grey literature to identify the contexts and mechanisms that enable the adoption, offer, uptake and return of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in the primary care pathway in England, UK, for patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). From this, develop a theory about how specific programme activities lead to certain outcomes.

designA realist synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Medline (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier) and grey literature sources until end of July 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING EVIDENCE: The purpose of the work was to determine how different factors interact within a health system to optimise the approach to implementing and using symptomatic FIT (sFIT) in clinical practice for patient benefit. The criteria used to bound the scope of the synthesis included date (published between 2017 and July 2023), exposure of interest (sFIT in the primary care pathway for patients with signs or symptoms of suspected CRC), geographic location of study (countries that make up the UK), language (English) and participants (adults). Any study design and type of publication was considered.Given the recognised lack of literature on the implementation of sFIT, it was crucial to include insights from grey literature. To do this, key national groups and organisations-involved or related to this subject-were methodically identified and appropriate papers and reports identified. ANALYSIS: A thematic approach was used to identify relevant data in included records and allow realist insights to be obtained. Inductive and deductive coding enabled detection of key data. Arguments were generated and developed into context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs). Iteratively, an initial list of 38 CMOCs was refined to 14 themes and 19 CMOCs. These were then structured to create a multifaceted, multilevel realist synthesis programme theory.

resultsSystematic searching led to the full appraisal of 99 records to determine suitability of each to confirm, refute or help develop theory. Studies were assessed for rigour and relevance to inform selection. The process resulted in 45 records being chosen for inclusion, of which 28 were from database searches and 17 from grey literature sources.The key contexts and mechanisms that help optimise adoption, offer, uptake and return of sFIT have been elucidated (although partially). These can be broadly summarised into the 10 'Cs': creating a compelling Case and Conditions for change, reaching Consensus through Collaborative working, fostering a Culture that values Clinical judgement, building Confidence by developing Capabilities and, finally, ensuring Clarity and Coherence of both practical processes and safety netting procedures.

conclusionsFundamentally, optimising the adoption, offer, uptake and return of sFIT in primary care for patients with signs or symptoms of suspected CRC is predicated on developing the acceptability of this initiative to every stakeholder at every level within a health system.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerOccult BloodPrimary Health CareEnglandFecesHumansGastrointestinal tumoursHealth ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID41198192
PMCPMC12593461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.