ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025
Efficacy and Impact of Prophylactic Compared with Symptomatic Amoxicillin, Azithromycin, or Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole Administration on Corynebacterium bovis Infection in NSG Mice (Mus musculus).
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infection with Corynebacterium bovis causes significant clinical disease in immunocompromised mice. The impact of antibiotics, administered prophylactically or symptomatically, on body weight, clinical condition, skin histopathology, and gut microbiota was assessed in NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice infected with C. bovis. Mice were untreated (n = 5) or received oral amoxicillin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (TMS), or azithromycin a day prior to C. bovis exposure (n = 5/antibiotic) or after clinical signs developed (n = 5/antibiotic). Body weights and clinical scores were ascertained weekly. Mice were euthanized 24 weeks after infection, or earlier if humane endpoints were reached. Skin biopsies and fecal samples were collected at necropsy for histopathology scoring and gut flora characterization. Mice treated with amoxicillin had significant improvement in their clinical signs for the duration of treatment; however, 2 mice treated prophylactically experienced severe weight loss that necessitated euthanasia. Amoxicillin-treated mice had aberrant gut microbiota, including Clostridioides difficile colonization. In contrast, mice treated with TMS had no difference in their clinical scores, and their skin pathology was more severe, compared with untreated mice. There was no difference between symptomatic and prophylactic treatment. Clinical disease in azithromycin-treated mice improved for ∼5 weeks, but ultimately clinical disease recrudesced despite continuing therapy. Mice treated prophylactically with azithromycin experienced severe weight loss that necessitated euthanasia. Changes in the intestinal flora were not appreciated in mice treated with TMS or azithromycin as compared with untreated controls. While clinical signs of C. bovis infection in NSG mice improved when treated with amoxicillin, marked changes in the intestinal flora of these animals require careful consideration of both animal health and experimental outcomes before its use. TMS and azithromycin did not ameliorate C. bovis-associated disease, and their use as therapeutics for C. bovis is not recommended. Untreated C. bovis infection was not life-limiting for up to 24 weeks in NSG mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.