ArticleVirus research2025
Novel quantitative and specific RT-qPCR assay for UK subtypes of European strain of Tick-borne encephalitis virus.
Article in Virus research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two closely related tick-borne Orthoflaviviruses have been detected in the UK; tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and louping ill virus (LIV). Diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis is achieved by detection of IgM/IgG antibodies using ELISA, Immunofluorescence, or by RT-PCR. High sequence and structural similarities between these viruses means they are hard to distinguish due to high cross-reactivity. We have developed a novel RT-qPCR assay using recently identified subtypes of TBEV in the UK and a probe incorporating locked nucleic acids, strengthening hybridisation between the probe and target RNA/DNA, resulting in greater discrimination between thermodynamically similar sequences. Cell-cultured virus extracts and an in vitro transcript of the NS1 gene were used for assay validation. TBEV was specifically detected to a sensitivity of 13 copies per reaction at 95 % confidence with 94 % efficiency. The assay showed no cross-reactivity to 10 Flavivirus RNA extracts tested. Of 43 clinical tick bite samples tested, 23 were TBEV seropositive and all tested negative by the currently used qPCR assay, matching our assay results. A sensitive, highly specific RT-qPCR assay that distinguishes between UK subtypes of TBEV and LIV. This distinction is vital for both accurate clinical diagnosis and vector surveillance, especially in the UK where both viruses co-circulate and cross-reactivity remains a significant diagnostic challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.