Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41197638›Full record

SynthesisJMIR aging2025

Aesthetic Experience in the Acceptance of Wearable Technology for People With Dementia: Critical Interpretive Synthesis.

Yixuan Wei, John Ratcliffe, Dag Aarsland, Wei Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yixuan WeiDepartment of Engineering, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom, 44 2078365454.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2319-0689
John RatcliffeDepartment of Engineering, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom, 44 2078365454.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6835-6199
Dag AarslandInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6314-216X
Wei LiuDepartment of Engineering, King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom, 44 2078365454.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8014-7218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of dementia has led to a growing interest in wearable technologies to assist dementia care. Despite their potential, these technologies face low adoption rates, often attributed to poor aesthetic design and insufficient consideration of user experience. Objective: This study aims to (1) explore how the aesthetic design of wearable devices relates to their adoption and user experience in dementia care and (2) critically examine the ways in which aesthetic elements shape people with dementia's perceptions of acceptability and inform future design considerations. Methods: A critical interpretive synthesis with a systematic search was conducted across 2 databases, namely Web of Science and Scopus on August 22, 2024. Studies were included if they reported on the current use of wearable technologies in dementia care or provided value in qualitative studies addressing attitudes from people with dementia and their caregivers toward the wearable product. Two authors independently screened the abstracts and full texts to extract data, and additional studies were included from web searches, owing to their conceptual contributions to offering insights into the emergence of wearable technology, including the factors driving its commercial value and appraisal. Results: A total of 63 studies were included in this study. Findings suggest that aesthetically considered designs are preferred by users when concerning their acceptance toward wearable devices, particularly when devices symbolize empowerment and support personal engagement. The objects that evoke comfort, emotional connection, and personal meaning are more likely to be accepted by people with dementia. Improved aesthetics may also support caregivers through more consistent and effective data collection. Conclusions: This study uncovers a significant gap in the aesthetic design of wearable technologies for dementia care, limiting user acceptance and emotional engagement. By synthesizing key themes focusing on the interaction between user and product, this review proposes a conceptual framework for dementia care, emphasizing the importance of aesthetics in enabling more meaningful, inclusive, and human-centered design.

Indexed as

DementiaEstheticsWearable Electronic DevicesCaregiversHumansaestheticsassistive technologydementia carehealth care designwearable technology

Identifiers

PMID41197638
PMCPMC12591609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.