Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41197633›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025

Frog-killing chytrid fungus deploys different strategies to regulate intracellular pressure in developmental states that have or lack a cell wall.

Sarah M Prostak, Katrina B Velle, Lillian K Fritz-Laylin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah M ProstakDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Katrina B VelleDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA.
Lillian K Fritz-LaylinDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Electronic address: lfritzlaylin@umass.edu.

Funding

Defining cytoskeletal mechanisms driving cell motility in NaegleriaR00GM147656 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH · PI Katrina Velle · 2024 to 2026
$747k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM147656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell morphogenesis is crucial for the physiology of animals and fungi alike. While animals typically shape their cells using the actin cytoskeleton, fungi control cell shape through polarized deposition of new cell-wall material, which is inflated by intracellular osmotic "turgor" pressure. Understanding where and when these mechanisms evolved is essential for understanding cell morphogenesis evolution. To this end, we study chytrid fungi, which have a cell type that lacks a cell wall (the "zoospore") and a cell type that has a cell wall (the "sporangium"). While chytrid sporangia rely on polarized cell-wall growth to control shape, we previously showed that the "frog-killing" chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis uses actin to control zoospore shape. Whether either zoospores or sporangia also use intracellular pressure regulation in cell-shape control remains an open question. We use live-cell imaging, environmental perturbations, and small-molecule inhibitors to show that B. dendrobatidis sporangia generate and maintain turgor pressure, whereas B. dendrobatidis zoospores use specialized organelles called contractile vacuoles to pump water out of the cell, thereby keeping internal pressure low. Because chytrid fungi diverged prior to the evolution of the Dikarya-the fungal group including yeasts, mushrooms, and filamentous fungi-these findings suggest that turgor pressure evolved early and that cell morphogenesis underwent a major transition during early fungal evolution. We also suggest that the last common fungal ancestor may have, like chytrid fungi, employed stage-specific strategies for cell-shape control-illustrating how developmental flexibility in cellular mechanisms can serve as a wellspring of evolutionary innovation.

Indexed as

BatrachochytriumCell WallChytridiomycotaAnimalsMorphogenesisOsmotic PressureSporangiaSpores, FungalBatrachochytrium dendrobatidiscell wallchytridcontractile vacuoledevelopmentevolutionfungimorphogenesisosmoregulationturgor pressure

Identifiers

PMID41197633
PMCPMC12818911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.