ArticleTuberculosis and respiratory diseases2026
Spirometry-Defined Restriction Modifies the Association between Forced Vital Capacity and Bronchiectasis Exacerbation.
Article in Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObstructive ventilatory defect (OVD) is the most common ventilatory pattern in bronchiectasis, with low forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), which is a well-known risk factor for acute exacerbation (AE). However, the impact of spirometry- defined restrictive components (restrictive ventilatory defects [RVD] or mixed ventilatory defects [MVD]) on AE remains unreported. This study evaluated the association between spirometry-defined restrictive components and AE risk in patients with bronchiectasis.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, patients from 51 referral hospitals in the Republic of Korea were classified into the normal (FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ lower limit of normal [LLN] and FVC≥LLN, n=62), OVD (FEV1/FVC<LLN and FVC≥LLN, n=59), RVD (FEV1/FVC≥LLN and FVC<LLN, n=148), and MVD (FEV1/FVC<LLN and FVC<LLN, n=223) groups. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of AE associated with ventilatory defects were compared using the normal group as a reference group.
resultsThe MVD group had the highest annual severe AE IRR (3.557; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.918 to 17.851), followed by the RVD (2.678; 95% CI, 0.704 to 13.422) and OVD groups (1.926; 95% CI, 0.379 to 11.430) (p for trend=0.051) compared to the normal group. Lower FVC and FEV₁ were significantly associated with increased risk of any AE and severe AE in the RVD and MVD groups. The spirometry-defined restrictive component significantly affected the relationships of any AE and severe AE with FVC (p for interaction <0.05), not with FEV1.
conclusionThe presence of a spirometry-defined restrictive component was associated with higher annual rates for any AE and severe AE, which modified the FVC, not FEV1, effect on the risk for such events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.