Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41196937›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Interpretable machine learning for cardiovascular risk prediction: Insights from NHANES dietary and health data.

Md Ahiduzzaman, Md Nahid Hasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Md AhiduzzamanDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1404-6453
Md Nahid HasanDepartment of Mathematics, East Texas A&M University, Commerce, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9069-1815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the leading global causes of death, which requires an accurate early prediction. This study aimed to develop transparent machine learning (ML) models using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2017-2023 to predict CVD risk based on dietary and health factors.

methodsWe analyzed data from 12,382 adults (aged 18 and older) from NHANES 2017-2023, including 41 dietary, anthropometric, clinical, and demographic variables. Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) was used to select an optimal subset of 30 predictors. To address substantial class imbalance in the outcome, we applied the Random Over-Sampling Examples (ROSE) technique to the training data. Five machine learning models-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, XGBoost, and LightGBM-were trained and evaluated. Model interpretability was assessed using LIME and SHAP.

resultsParticipants with CVD differed significantly from those without CVD in age, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, C-reactive protein (CRP), and multiple dietary nutrients, with a consistently lower nutrient intake in the CVD group. Among the ML models evaluated, XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (0.8216) and recall (0.8645), while Random Forest showed the highest AUROC (0.8139). Interpretability analyses identified age as the strongest predictor, followed by vitamin B12, total cholesterol, CRP, and waist circumference.

conclusionInterpretable ML models effectively identified key dietary and clinical factors for CVD risk. Nutrients like vitamin B12 and niacin, alongside established clinical indicators, emerged as significant predictors, underscoring their potential role in nutritional interventions and public health strategies for CVD prevention.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDietMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41196937
PMCPMC12591444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.