ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning based fault classification for improved induction motor performance.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the design of an effective fault classification algorithm for 3 phase induction motor, an integral unit in many industrial systems. It is found that traditional fault detection methods and deep learning approaches are both effective; however, current techniques can either be computationally exhaustive, or suffer from low accuracy, thus making them inapplicable in many real-world settings. To address these limitations, this study evaluates different machine learning algorithms for accurate and efficient fault detection using a dataset of triaxial vibrational data converted into current variables. A dataset of triaxial vibrational current data at 0.7 mm bearing and rotor faults at various loads (100W, 200W, and 300W) were considered. For the data preprocessing, we handled with the missing values by interpolation and handle data imbalance fault types with Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). Through Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) techniques, the frequency domain information were extracted, which is key for current signals, adding to the feature set. In addition, dimensionality reduction with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and feature selection was done with SelectKBest. Then, the different machine learning models such as Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was trained to optimize the hyperparameters and make them perform to its best possible. The results shows the accuracy and performance of all models, DT and RF show good performance, with 99.95% accuracy, while KNN performs well, but at a higher computational cost in testing. Generally known for its capability to handle all the complex dataset, XGBoost wasn't able to perform in this scenario as it got an accuracy of 87.13%, indicating potentially more optimization is required for the model. This work serves as the groundwork for future work with a multiplicity of fault types, motor specifications, and the incorporation of additional feature-engineering techniques to develop a more robust and intelligent framework for fault detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.