ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Bottleneck and enabler evaluation of avian influenza health event - Guatemala, January-February 2023.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In February 2023, H5N1 was identified in 11 wild pelicans in Izabal, Guatemala. These were the first known cases of H5N1 in the country. This study assessed the timeliness of the response to this One Health event using the "7-1-7" benchmarks, which propose the following metrics: detection within seven days, notification within one day, and completion of early response within seven days. Open-ended interviews were conducted in September 2023 with nine key informants from the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food (MAGA) and the Ministry of Health and Social Assistance (MSPAS) who were directly involved in the response. Participants included epidemiologists, laboratory analysts, and other relevant personnel. Interviews were analyzed using UNICEF's "Human-Centered Design 4 Health" approach to qualitative fieldwork. Detection and notification were completed in one day, while early response was completed in 34 days. Key enablers of the response included interregional notification and cooperation, availability of earmarked emergency funds, event-based surveillance, and support from laboratories across public and private sectors. Reported bottlenecks included limited national laboratory testing capacity, challenges in inter-agency and intra-agency communication, workforce constraints, and equipment shortages. This outbreak response met the detection and notification criteria but did not achieve the 7-day target for completing early response activities. As one of the few qualitative studies examining avian influenza response in Central America, these findings highlight how strengthening a One Health approach, particularly in communication, workforce, and laboratory capacity, could enhance preparedness for future outbreaks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.