ArticlePloS one2025
Semi-supervised synthesis of 7T MRI from 3T using 3D FR-U-Net with anatomical segmentation consistency assessment.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-high-field 7T MRI provides substantial benefits for neuroimaging, including improved resolution and contrast, but remains limited by high costs and restricted accessibility. In this study, we propose a semi-supervised 3D multi-scale fusion residual U-Net (semi supervised 3D FR-U-Net) to synthesize 7T MRI volumes from 3T input using a patch-based architecture optimized for low-data settings. In addition to evaluating conventional synthesis metrics such as PSNR, SSIM, and NMSE, we introduce a novel segmentation-based assessment using the VolBrain pipeline to quantify anatomical fidelity. Our model outperforms prior methods-even without preprocessing steps like skull stripping-and achieves high fidelity in global brain morphology and basal ganglia structures. However, significant asymmetry errors in hippocampal segmentation highlight limitations in preserving fine, clinically critical anatomy. To address the disconnect between technical performance and clinical applicability, we emphasize the use of interpretable, segmentation-derived metrics to bridge the gap between research advances in synthetic MRI and real-world diagnostic relevance. These findings underscore the importance of region-specific evaluation and demonstrate how structural metrics can guide the real-world applicability of synthetic MRI, particularly when expert radiological review is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.