ArticlePloS one2025
Spatial distribution and relative biomass of bigheaded carps in Lake Balaton, Hungary estimated from an environmental DNA survey.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), bighead carp (H. molitrix) and their hybrids, collectively known as bigheaded carps, have been introduced to Lake Balaton, Hungary. The current stock sizes are difficult to assess. We investigated environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques targeted for bigheaded carps, assessed the spatial distribution of eDNA in Lake Balaton, compared eDNA concentrations to environmental variables to assess potential habitat selection based on those variables, and provided an estimate of biomass of bigheaded carps relative to eDNA shedding rates per unit biomass observed in controlled experiments. Water samples were collected from 70 sites in an array across the lake. Biomass estimation was calculated using mean eDNA concentration obtained by quantitative PCR of the samples and previously determined eDNA shedding rates of bigheaded carps under controlled conditions in a laboratory. Concentration of eDNA was highly variable between sites, resulting in wide confidence intervals. Basins did not significantly differ in eDNA concentration, and there were no strong relationships between environmental variables and eDNA concentration, indications that bigheaded carps use the entire lake. The model provided an estimate of 4,830 metric tonnes (2,750-8,030 tonnes) of bigheaded carps in Lake Balaton, or 81.0 kg/ha. The eDNA method produced a value close to previous estimates by traditional means of total biomass of bigheaded carps in the lake, and like traditional methods, there was a broad confidence interval on the estimate of the mean. The results of the present study support the utility of aquatic eDNA analysis, and the need for further comparisons with fisheries methods and supporting data from laboratory studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.