ArticlePloS one2025
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the STarT back tool for Jordanian Arabic-speaking adults with low back pain.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Keele STarT Back Tool (STarTBack) was developed to categorize people with low back pain based on disability risk. The tool was cross-culturally adapted and validated in different languages and countries, including Arabic in Saudi Arabia. However, the tool has not been cross-culturally adapted and validated among Arabic-Jordanian speakers.
objectiveTo cross-culturally adapt and validate the Keele STarT Back Tool (STarTBack) for Arabic-speaking adults with low back pain (LBP) in Jordan.
methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in hospitals and physical therapy departments. The STarTBack was translated following international guidelines. Cross-cultural adaptation was assessed through interviews with experts and individuals with LBP. Internal consistency, construct validity (via correlation with related measures), and discriminative validity (using Receiver Operating Characteristic curves) were examined.
resultsTwenty participants participated in the content validity assessment (mean age: 41.3 years; 50% female), while 107 participants took part in the pre-final version testing (mean age: 39.2 years; 54.2% female). One item required minor modification for clarity. Our preliminary results showed that the adapted STarTBack-AR demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Moderate-to-high correlations supported construct validity. Discriminative validity was acceptable-to-excellent for disability, catastrophizing, anxiety and depression.
conclusionThe culturally adapted STarTBack-AR is a reliable and valid tool for stratifying Arabic-speaking Jordanian patients with LBP according to their risk of disability. Its implementation has potential to improve care through targeted treatment approaches, thereby reducing the risk of disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.