Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41196877›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

When winning costs your peace: How does vertical individualism Hijack relaxation capacity? Network analysis and mediation models.

Wenyan Cheng, Ling Cheng, Zhichao Qian, Haoyu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenyan ChengCollege of Education Science, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1806-8962
Ling ChengCollege of Education Science, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, China.
Zhichao QianCollege of Education Science, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, China.
Haoyu WangCollege of Education Science, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8551-9866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of increasing competition, the phenomenon of individuals experiencing guilt or anxiety at rest has become more pronounced, particularly among Chinese university students. While previous research has primarily explained this phenomenon from the perspective of collectivist cultures, this study posits that vertical individualism may offer a more compelling explanation. A sample of 550 Chinese university students was surveyed to collect data on vertical/horizontal individualism-collectivism, status anxiety, and rest intolerance. A partial correlation network analysis, controlling for demographic covariates, was conducted to explore the psychological structure of these constructs. The results identified Vertical Individualism (VI) and Status Anxiety (SA) as the core bridge nodes connecting the community of cultural values to the dimensions of rest intolerance. Subsequent mediation analyses confirmed that SA partially mediated the relationship between VI and overall rest intolerance. This indirect effect was particularly pronounced for the affective and social-comparative components of the phenomenon. These findings challenge traditional collectivist frameworks and reveal a nuanced psychological mechanism: competitive cultural values exacerbate rest intolerance through the pathway of status anxiety. This provides novel theoretical insights for psychological interventions and cultural adaptation education in higher education settings.

Indexed as

AnxietyIndividualityStudentsAdolescentAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41196877
PMCPMC12591470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.