ArticlePloS one2025
Influence of body position on microcirculatory and autonomic responses during arterial occlusion in healthy adults.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between post-occlusive reactive hyperemia and the level of training and lifestyle in young adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Posture-Dependent Signal Intensity and Contrast Alterations in Low-Field Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Limb composition: implications for the determination of arterial occlusion pressure.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate how body position (supine, seated, and standing) influences post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) and autonomic nervous system activity, with implications for vascular health and the safety of blood flow-restricted (BFR) exercise. A prospective, within-subject design was implemented. Fifteen healthy participants (18-30 years) were evaluated across three experimental sessions. Each session involved one randomized body position. Arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), microcirculatory responses (resting flow [RF], biological zero [BZ], time to peak [TP], recovery time [TR]), and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters-average normal-to-normal interval (AVNN), standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), low-frequency/high-frequency power ratio (LF/HF), and heart rate (HR)-were recorded using laser Doppler flowmetry, Doppler ultrasound, and Polar H10 chest sensors. Standing and sitting positions significantly increased AOP min and AOP 100% compared to supine (p = 0.003, r ≥ 0.62). Resting flow and BZ values were also significantly elevated in these upright positions (sitting and standing) (p = 0.003). Time to peak and recovery time were longest in the standing position (p = 0.003-0.009). HRV analyses revealed a significant decrease in AVNN from supine to sitting and standing (p = 0.003), while SDNN and LF/HF increased in upright positions (sitting and standing) (p < 0.013). Heart rate was significantly higher in standing vs. sitting (p = 0.006), but not between supine and sitting (p = 0.459). Body position markedly influences both microcirculatory dynamics and autonomic nervous system responses. Upright positions (sitting and standing) elevate AOP and alter HRV, suggesting increased vascular and sympathetic activity. These findings are critical for optimizing BFR protocols and assessing cardiovascular safety during postural changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.