ArticleStereotactic and functional neurosurgery2026
Anatomical Group-Level Studies of the Volume of Tissue Activated by Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Model for Targeting?
Article in Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2026
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder for which deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established treatment. Despite standardized programming, some patients seem to respond very well to DBS (optimal responders), while others seem to react poorly (poor responders). The objective was to compare the area of tissue activated between optimal and poor responders and determine whether there is a potential optimal stimulation area.
methodsFor 338 PD patients with STN-DBS, four outcome categories on the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) motor part were assessed: hemibody, rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor score for left and right separately. For each outcome category, patients were divided into one of three responder groups, based on their percentage hemibody improvement (optimal responders, >70% improvement; responders, 30-70% improvement; poor responders, <30% improvement). For each of the resulting 12 groups, volumes of tissue activated (VTA) were modeled for every individual electrode based on the stimulation parameters during follow-up assessment. To enable the responder groups comparison, all VTAs were aggregated into a so-called heatmap in normalized space. As we were mainly interested in the difference in VTA location for the optimal and poor responders, only these group heatmaps were visually assessed in reference to the STN. For quantitative sub-analyses, the amount of current applied and spread of electrode location was compared.
resultsConsiderable overlap between heatmaps of optimal and poor responders within the dorsolateral region of the STN was seen. The amount of current applied and spread of electrode location did not differ.
conclusionsThis study comparing anatomical group-level studies of VTAs of optimal responders with poor responders for STN-DBS in PD did not find an area of optimal stimulation to reduce variability in DBS outcome. However, the heatmap of optimal responders can facilitate easier DBS targeting. To reduce variability in DBS outcome, focus could shift more toward patient-specific anatomy and connectivity levels in order to determine the individual optimal subthalamic area for programming. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.