ArticleThe Journal of general virology2025
Immunohistochemical investigation of canine lymph nodes collected during a rabies outbreak in South Africa.
Article in The Journal of general virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rabies is a fatal zoonosis that impairs host immune function, yet effects on peripheral lymphoid architecture are poorly defined. During a 2021-2022 rabies virus (RABV) outbreak in South Africa, we collected cervical lymph nodes from 36 rabies-suspect dogs; RABV RNA was detected in 27. Canine distemper virus RNA was detected in a subset across both RABV-positive (RABV+) and RABV-negative (RABV-) groups and was not associated with clinical-sign count. We set up a computer-assisted histological analysis tool to quantify germinal-centre (GC) nucleus density and immunohistochemistry for CD20, PNA and IBA1 to profile B cells, GC activity and macrophages. Within the outbreak cohort, GC density and marker-based metrics did not differ between RABV+ and RABV- dogs. Two healthy dogs were included as reference tissues; values in outbreak dogs were generally lower, but these contrasts are contextual given the limited, non-matched controls. This study provides a reproducible framework for quantifying immune cell organization in field-collected tissues during natural RABV exposure and highlights the need for larger, geographically matched control groups and complementary functional immune measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.