ArticleJAMA oncology2025
Unrelated Donor Age and Recipient Outcomes After Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide vs Conventional Prophylaxis.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- HLA matching in contemporary haematopoietic cell transplantation: Recommendations from the EBMT Practice Harmonisation and Guidelines Committee.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Guideline
- Mismatched Unrelated vs Matched Related Donor Transplant With Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide Among Patients With Blood Cancers.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Chronic graft-versus-host disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Article
- Uncoupling toxicity from efficacy in donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a retrospective cohort study using double machine learning.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- Development and explainable AI-driven characterization of a prognostic model for haploidentical transplantation outcomes.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Challenging a clinical dogma with multimodal machine learning: a retrospective analysis of transplant mismatched donor selection.Leukemia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Advanced age in unrelated donors (URDs) is a well-established risk factor in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), leading registries to prioritize younger donors. However, this paradigm relevance is uncertain in the era of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, a strategy increasingly adopted for its effectiveness. Clarifying this association is crucial for optimizing donor selection and potentially expanding the donor pool. Objective: To determine whether the association of older URD age with overall survival differs between patients receiving PTCy-based vs conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based GVHD prophylaxis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter cohort study using registry data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research for January 2017 through June 2021. Eligible participants were adult patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent an allogeneic HCT from a URD who was fully matched for 8 of 8 human leukocyte antigen loci (MUD) or mismatched for 7 of 8 human leukocyte antigen loci (MMUD). Data were analyzed from January to June 2025. Exposures: GVHD prophylaxis regimen (PTCy-based vs CNI-based) and donor age (analyzed continuously and categorically). Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was the primary outcome, with associations assessed using a multipronged approach including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-penalized Cox proportional hazards models, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and XGBoost machine learning. Results: The study analysis included 10 025 patients (mean [SD] age, 56.5 [14.4] years; 4379 female [43.7%] and 5646 male [56.3%] individuals) among whom 7272 (72.5%) had received MUD-CNI; 1681 (16.8%%) MUD-PTCy; 613 (6.1%) MMUD-PTCy; and 459 (4.6%) MMUD-CNI. Increasing donor age was associated with worse OS in CNI-based MUD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.004-1.009 per year increase) and MMUD (HR, 1.022-1.034) cohorts. Conversely, this association was not observed in the combined PTCy cohort (HR, 1.001-1.007). These findings were robust across standard and overlap weighted IPTW, LASSO-penalized models, and XGBoost analyses. The attenuated association in the PTCy cohort was primarily driven by a lack of association between donor age and nonrelapse mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study indicate that the association of donor age with URD HCT outcomes appears to be mitigated in the PTCy setting, suggesting that PTCy may counteract some of the adverse effects associated with increased unrelated donor age. This observation challenges existing paradigms and warrants validation in independent cohorts, and if validated, could substantially expand the donor pool.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.