Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41196547›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026

Perspectives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis towards the use of parenteral methotrexate: a qualitative study.

Jiun Ming Tan, Katherine Desforges, Wern Chern Chai, Susanna M Proudman, Michael D Wiese, Emily Reeve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiun Ming TanUniversity of South Australia, (UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation), Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3660-6496
Katherine DesforgesPharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, McGill University Health Centre, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Wern Chern ChaiHealth and Biomedical Innovation, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-4341
Susanna M ProudmanRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3046-9884
Michael D WieseUniversity of South Australia, (UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation), Adelaide, SA, Australia. Michael.Wiese@unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3255-9242
Emily ReeveFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1405-999X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory autoimmune disease. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the cornerstone of management and methotrexate is broadly considered as first-line treatment. Gastrointestinal side effects and variable bioavailability however limit adherence to and effectiveness of oral methotrexate, while parenteral methotrexate remains underutilized.

aimTo explore RA patients' perspective and their level of acceptance towards parenteral methotrexate and to investigate the barriers and enablers to its use.

methodA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews between May and August 2022. Participants were recruited using convenience and purposive sampling strategy. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) was used to guide the development of the interview guide and data analysis (directed content analysis).

resultsTwenty-five participants (68% female, 76% with experience using parenteral methotrexate) were interviewed. All seven TFA constructs were found to influence participants' acceptance of parenteral methotrexate. High acceptance was related to the TFA constructs "perceived effectiveness", "intervention coherence", "self-efficacy" and "ethicality". Experience with disease improvement and gastrointestinal tolerance with parenteral methotrexate was valued by the participants, and understanding these benefits was linked with high acceptability (perceived effectiveness). Participants reported a high level of confidence in using methotrexate injections and adapting to the injection-taking routine (self-efficacy). The user-friendly design of the methotrexate pre-filled syringe, along with the support from healthcare professionals, served as enablers (intervention coherence and ethicality). Minimal opportunity costs (e.g., no major lifestyle sacrifices) further supported acceptability, though some reported initial injection anxiety (affective attitude). Barriers were frequently identified in the "burden" construct, including travel inconvenience and injection-associated cost. Participants without the experience with methotrexate injections expressed the need for further information, particularly regarding the logistical and safety aspects of parenteral methotrexate (intervention coherence).

conclusionOur findings highlighted that patients' comprehension of the benefits of using parenteral methotrexate, confidence in self-administration, healthcare professionals' support, and the ease of using injections may help optimize treatment acceptability, underscoring the importance of patient's education from healthcare professionals and the availability of patient-friendly devices.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidMethotrexateAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexateConsumer perspectivesMethotrexateParenteral administrationQualitative ResearchRheumatoid ArthritisTheoretical Framework of Acceptability

Identifiers

PMID41196547
PMCPMC12992423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.