ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Biomechanical Characterization of Central Corneal Region Using Inflation Test and its Application to Predicting Central Corneal Response Under Intraocular Pressure.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the biomechanical properties of the central corneal region under intraocular pressure (IOP) and to develop an accurate method for predicting the corresponding responses.
methodsIn the rabbit corneal inflation test, a calculation method for the biomechanical properties in the thickness direction of the cornea was proposed. The corresponding stress-strain relationship was obtained from the change in the central corneal thickness and IOP. Finite element analysis (FEA) was utilized to predict the biomechanical responses of the central corneal region under IOP using the derived stress-strain relationship. The FEA predictions using the stress-strain relationships derived from the uniaxial tensile test and optical coherence elastography (OCE) were also conducted for comparison.
resultsThe prediction accuracy of the FEA based on the inflation test was evaluated against OCE (in-plane), OCE (out-of-plane), and uniaxial tensile test. Compared to these methods, the maximum deviation of the apex displacement prediction based on the inflation test decreased by 73.2, 88.4, and 64.4%, respectively, and the maximum deviation of the central curvature prediction decreased by 89.2, 30.7, and 49.7%, respectively.
conclusionThe stress-strain relationship in the thickness direction of the cornea can provide the most accurate prediction result of the corneal biomechanical responses under IOP. The inflation test-based method proposed can serve as an accurate tool for biomechanical characterization of the central corneal region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41196488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.