ArticleGenes & genomics2026
DeepIMB: Imputation of non-biological zero counts in microbiome data.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe high prevalence of non-biological zero counts, arising from low sequencing depth and sampling variation, presents a significant challenge in microbiome data analysis. These zeros can distort taxon abundance distributions and hinder the identification of true biological signals, complicating downstream analyses.
objectiveTo address the challenges of non-biological zeros in microbiome datasets, we propose DeepIMB, a deep learning-based imputation method for microbiome data, specifically designed to accurately identify and impute non-biological zero counts while preserving biological integrity.
methodsDeepIMB operates in two main phases. First, it identifies non-biological zeros using a gamma-normal mixture model applied to the normalized, log-transformed taxon count matrix. Second, it imputes these zeros with a deep neural network model that integrates diverse sources of information, including taxon abundances, sample covariates, and phylogenetic distances, thereby learning complex, nonlinear relationships within microbiome data.
resultsBy leveraging integrated information from multiple data types, DeepIMB accurately imputes non-biological zeros while preserving true biological signals. In our two simulation studies, DeepIMB outperformed existing imputation methods in terms of mean squared error, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Wasserstein distance.
conclusionDeepIMB effectively addresses the challenges posed by non-biological zeros in microbiome data. By improving the quality of the data and the reliability of downstream analyses, DeepIMB represents a significant advancement in microbiome research methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41196474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.