Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41196446›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2025

Osteosarcopenia as a risk factor for fractures and mortality - 19-year follow-up of a population-based sample.

Matias Blomqvist, Maria S Nuotio, Katri Sääksjärvi, Jaana Pentti BSc, Seppo Koskinen, Sari Stenholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matias BlomqvistDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Häppiläntie 30, 20900, Turku, Finland. maerbl@utu.fi.
Maria S NuotioDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Häppiläntie 30, 20900, Turku, Finland.
Katri SääksjärviWelfare Epidemiology and Monitoring Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana Pentti BScClinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Seppo KoskinenWelfare Epidemiology and Monitoring Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Sari StenholmDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study assessed osteoporosis, sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia as risk factors for fractures and mortality during 19-year follow-up.

methodsWe analyzed 2506 individuals aged ≥ 55 from the Finnish Health 2000 Survey. Probable sarcopenia was defined as grip strength < 27 kg for men and < 16 kg for women. Osteoporosis was identified by a bone density T-score < -2,5 via ultrasound or a self-reported diagnosis. Participants were categorized in four groups: reference group with no sarcopenia and no osteoporosis, probable sarcopenia only, osteoporosis only, or osteosarcopenia. Fractures and deaths were identified from national registers until 2019. Four adjustment models were used, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, education, physical activity, and mobility limitation.

resultsOver a mean follow-up of 19.1 years, 580 (23.1%) participants sustained a low-energy fracture of any type and 1,375 (54.9%) died. Osteosarcopenia, probable sarcopenia and osteoporosis were all associated with increased risk of any fracture and mortality compared to the reference group. Osteoporosis alone was associated with lower mortality than osteosarcopenia (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95), but mortality did not differ between probable sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59-1.06). No differences in the fracture risk between osteosarcopenia, sarcopenia and osteoporosis were observed.

conclusionWhile both sarcopenia and osteoporosis increase fracture and mortality risks, their combination does not seem to additively elevate fracture risks. Osteoporosis is a stronger predictor for future fractures, whereas probable sarcopenia is more closely linked to mortality. Further research is warranted to determine the best ways to incorporate sarcopenia assessment into comprehensive fracture risk evaluation.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOsteoporosisSarcopeniaAgedBone DensityFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsFractureMortalityOlder adultsOsteoporosisOsteosarcopeniaRiskSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID41196446
PMCPMC12592282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.