ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2025
Evaluation of the relationship between biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures of intensive care unit patients.
Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics of an NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain belonging to ST105.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elucidating the relationship between biofilm formation and specific antibiotic resistance is important for understanding resistance mechanisms. In this study, the antibiotic resistance profiles of 64 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) strains isolated from intensive care patients were determined using the VITEK-2 compact system, and their biofilm production ability was assessed using the microtiter plate method to investigate the relationship between the two. Additionally, the minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBEC) of vancomycin, linezolid, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin were determined against isolates with varying biofilm production capacities. All the strains were susceptible to linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin, while resistant to ampicillin, benzylpenicillin, and rifampicin. Resistance rates to other antibiotics ranged between 1.6% (quinupristin/dalfopristin) and 96.9% (oxacillin). Overall, 48.4% of the isolates produced biofilm. The biofilm production potential of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains (62.1%) was significantly higher than that of non-S. epidermidis CoNS strains (37.1%) (p < 0.05). No significant relationship was found between biofilm production and specific antibiotic resistance (p > 0.05). Contrary to the general literature, non-biofilm-producing strains were resistant to a greater number of antibiotics than biofilm-producing strains (p < 0.05). Crucially, MBEC values demonstrated a strong positive correlation with biofilm density, increasing up to > 1024 μg/mL in strong biofilm producers. The results indicate that biofilm production does not predict specific antibiotic resistance, and that non-biofilm-producing strains may have compensated for the lack of biofilm production by developing specific antibiotic resistance. However, biofilm formation confers significant phenotypic tolerance, necessitating much higher antibiotic concentrations for eradication than those indicated by conventional susceptibility testing. In addition to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid, daptomycin, tigecycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and quinupristin/dalfopristin were also found to be effective options for multidrug-resistant planktonic infections, though their efficacy against biofilm-embedded cells may be substantially limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41196406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.