SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Effect of multisensory stimuli on neonatal pain during blood sample collection: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pain Management During Neonatal Blood Sampling: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2026Review
- The organization of pediatric care: the right care, from the right professional, at the right time and place: an editorial update.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multisensory stimulation (MSS) effectively alleviates procedural pain in neonates during blood sample collection. However, quantitative evidence on the comparative effectiveness of different sensory stimulation types remains limited. This network meta-analysis (NMA) systematically evaluated the efficacy of MSS interventions in reducing neonatal pain during blood sampling. The results aim to provide an evidence-based foundation for selecting optimal clinical pain-management protocols. A NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies using MSS interventions were included. A systematic search was performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang, and VIP databases from inception to May 14, 2025. Pain scores served as the primary outcome measure and were analyzed as continuous variables. The effect size was calculated using standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (Crl). Bayesian NMA was performed using Stata 18.0 software. A total of 46 RCTs involving 5836 neonates were included. Among these, 11 studies focused on arteriovenous blood collection, examining 7 different MSS types, and 35 studies focused on heel blood collection, examining 8 MSS types. For arteriovenous blood sampling, three interventions showed significantly better pain relief compared to the routine method, with the tactile-taste-kinesthetic intervention demonstrating the greatest effect (SMD = -3.29; 95% credible interval [Crl], -5.47 to -1.12). For heel blood sampling, five interventions were more effective than the routine method, with the tactile-taste-auditory intervention exhibiting the best analgesic effect (SMD = -5.45; 95% credible interval [Crl], -7.44 to -3.47). MSS significantly reduces procedural pain during neonatal blood sampling. Future research should investigate the impact of intervention duration, frequency, timing, and choice of pain-assessment tools to further optimize pain-management strategies in neonates. What is Known: • Blood sampling is a common, painful procedure in neonatal intensive care units. • MSS is effective in alleviating neonatal procedural pain during blood collection. What is New: • The study focused on blood sampling pain to evaluate the most effective interventions for pain relief during arteriovenous and heel blood collections, and to rank various sensory stimuli. • MSS was the primary intervention method examined to determine the optimal approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.