ArticleOecologia2025
Survival benefits of antipredator training in captive-reared salmon: impact of behaviour, health, and genetics.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Releasing captive-reared animals into the wild is a common population management practise, but their inexperience with predators often leads to high post-release mortality. Although captive animals can be trained to recognize and respond to predatory cues, the post-release survival benefits of this method remain uncertain. Additionally, how factors related to captive breeding and rearing-such as hybridization and disease, which can affect learning and memory-influence the effectiveness of antipredator training has not been investigated. We conducted two experiments with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), during which they first underwent antipredator training via paired exposure to predator cues (Northern pike, Esox lucius) and conspecific alarm cues, followed by release into semi-natural streams for predation trials with live pike. The first experiment focused on post-release behaviours and demonstrated innate predator avoidance that was not enhanced by the training. In the second experiment, genetic background (purebred versus hybrid crosses) and parasite infection status (trematode eye fluke, Diplostomum pseudospathaceum) of the salmon were manipulated to assess their effects on antipredator learning. This experiment demonstrated a clear survival benefit from the training, which was not influenced by either the genetic background or infection. The variation in effectiveness of the antipredator training between the experiments may be attributed to different experimental environments and developmental stages of the salmon. Overall, our findings suggest that antipredator training conducted under specific conditions enhances post-release survival of captive-reared salmon, providing valuable insights for reintroduction and population augmentation programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.