Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41196370›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

H3.3G34W immunohistochemistry negative giant cell tumour of bone. Extended analysis of 35 such cases from a single institution in India.

Shantveer G Uppin, Monalisa Hui, Derin Mary Thomas, Megha S Uppin, K Nageshwara Rao, Rajeev Reddy, Himakanth Lingala

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shantveer G UppinDepartment of Pathology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, 500038, India. drsguppin@yahoo.co.in.
Monalisa HuiDepartment of Pathology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, 500038, India.
Derin Mary ThomasDepartment of Pathology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, 500038, India.
Megha S UppinDepartment of Pathology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, 500038, India.
K Nageshwara RaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, 500038, India.
Rajeev ReddyOrthopedic Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, 500033, India.
Himakanth LingalaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Century Hospital, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though anti-histone H3.3G34W antibody is highly sensitive to giant cell tumours of bone, a subset of tumours which are negative on immunohistochemistry harbours variant H3F3A mutations. In this study, the diagnostic utility of anti-histone H3.3G34V and R immunohistochemistry was assessed along with H3F3A gene mutation analysis by Sanger sequencing. This study also attempted to establish an algorithmic approach to analysis of H3.3G34W immunohistochemically negative tumours. Immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-histone H3.3G34R and anti-histone H3.3G34V antibodies in 35 anti-histone H3.3G34W IHC negative tumours. Simultaneously, all the tumours were subjected to Sanger sequencing to detect mutations in H3F3A gene. Of the 35 tumours tested, 14 showed positive staining for H3.3G34V and one for H3.3G34R immunohistochemistry. Gene mutation analysis by sequencing detected 3 additional cases of H3.3G34W mutation not detected by immunohistochemistry. Of the 14 tumours with H3.3G34V immunohistochemical expression, 11 showed corresponding H3.3G35V mutation on sequencing and a single tumour with H3.3G34R expression showed corresponding H3.3G35R mutation. In addition, sequencing detected 5 cases of H3.3G35L mutation which were negative on immunohistochemistry. Combining immunohistochemistry and sequencing results for the overall 309 GCTBs diagnosed during the study period, the most frequent H3F3A gene mutation was H3.3G34W/H3.3G35W (277/309, 89.6%). Other variants included H3.3G34V/H3.3G35V (14/309,4.5%), H3.3G34L/H3.3G35L (5/309,1.6%), and H3.3G34R/H3.3G35R (1/309,0.3%), while 3.9% (12/309) had the wild-type gene. Immunohistochemistry with H3.3 G34W, H3.3 G34R and G34V can be used as a surrogate for detection of corresponding H3F3A gene mutations. These antibodies should be used as first-line tests for confirming the diagnosis with sequencing being restricted only to tumors negative on immunohistochemistry.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsGiant Cell Tumor of BoneHistonesImmunohistochemistryAdolescentAdultChildDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedMutationYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorHistonesHistone mutationImmunohistochemistryNegativeSanger sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.