ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model based on multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for localizing clinically significant prostate cancer by simulation of targeted biopsies.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04605276 (Improving the AI-based Image Analysis Algorithm for 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound for the Detection, Grading and Localization of Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving the AI-based Image Analysis Algorithm for 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound for the Detection, Grading and Localization of Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a quantitative multiparametric ultrasound and deep learning classifier for the detection of prostate cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectivesAn AI model that performs well during training does not guarantee similar performance in clinical practice and should be carefully evaluated before implementation. We aimed to evaluate a voxel-level trained AI model (AUROC 0.87), which utilizes a three-dimensional multiparametric transrectal prostate ultrasound (3D mpUS) to identify clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe included patients with csPCa (Grade Group ≥ 2 and scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP)) and without csPCa (PI-RADS ≤ 2 and/or negative systematic biopsies). Histopathology of RP specimens provided the csPCa reference standard. 3D mpUS consisted of grayscale, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and shear-wave elastography using automated acquisition. We assessed patient-level diagnostic accuracy by comparing the results of simulated targeted biopsies based on the AI model with the reference standard in internal and external evaluation. Patients without csPCa and RP reference standard were used to determine specificity.
resultsBased on internal evaluation of 250 patients, a sensitivity of 0.82 (CI 0.75 to 0.87) and specificity of 0.43 (CI 0.32 to 0.55) was reached for ISUP ≥ 2. For ISUP ≥ 3, this was 0.90 (CI 0.83-0.95) and 0.39 (CI 0.31-0.47). In the external evaluation of 77 patients, the sensitivity for ISUP ≥ 2 was 0.81 (CI 0.65-0.90), with a specificity of 0.42 (CI 0.28-0.57). For ISUP ≥ 3, this was 0.96 (CI 0.78-0.99) and 0.42 (CI 0.30-0.55).
conclusionsThe AI model based on 3D mpUS showed consistent patient-level performance for csPCa detection in internal and external evaluation, comparable to voxel-level analysis. These suggest strong generalizability and support prospective clinical trials.
trial registrationNCT04605276. KEY POINTS: Question Does the diagnostic performance of a 3D multiparametric ultrasound-based AI model translate from voxel-level training to patient-level biopsy simulation? Findings Simulated biopsy performance aligned with voxel-level results, showing robust csPCa detection and supporting the model's generalizability across independent datasets. Clinical relevance The AI model's consistent biopsy simulation performance confirms its readiness for clinical evaluation and suggests diagnostic value in MRI-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.