Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41196365›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model based on multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for localizing clinically significant prostate cancer by simulation of targeted biopsies.

Daniel L van den Kroonenberg, Florian Delberghe, Auke Jager, Arnoud W Postema, Katelijne C C de Bie, Johannes B Reitsma, Marije Zwart, Hessel Wijkstra, Anna Garrido-Utrilla, Joost de Baaij and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04605276 (Improving the AI-based Image Analysis Algorithm for 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound for the Detection, Grading and Localization of Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04605276 completednot on this map

Improving the AI-based Image Analysis Algorithm for 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound for the Detection, Grading and Localization of Prostate Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2021 to 2024Enrolled608ConditionsProstate CancerArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel L van den KroonenbergDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.kroonenbergvanden@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-4193
Florian DelbergheLab of Biomedical Diagnostics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Auke JagerDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arnoud W PostemaDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Katelijne C C de BieDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes B ReitsmaJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marije ZwartAngiogenesis Analytics, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Hessel WijkstraLab of Biomedical Diagnostics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Anna Garrido-UtrillaAngiogenesis Analytics, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Joost de BaaijDepartment of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jean-Paul A van BastenDepartment of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harrie P BeerlageDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Massimo MischiLab of Biomedical Diagnostics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jorg R OddensDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectivesAn AI model that performs well during training does not guarantee similar performance in clinical practice and should be carefully evaluated before implementation. We aimed to evaluate a voxel-level trained AI model (AUROC 0.87), which utilizes a three-dimensional multiparametric transrectal prostate ultrasound (3D mpUS) to identify clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included patients with csPCa (Grade Group ≥ 2 and scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP)) and without csPCa (PI-RADS ≤ 2 and/or negative systematic biopsies). Histopathology of RP specimens provided the csPCa reference standard. 3D mpUS consisted of grayscale, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and shear-wave elastography using automated acquisition. We assessed patient-level diagnostic accuracy by comparing the results of simulated targeted biopsies based on the AI model with the reference standard in internal and external evaluation. Patients without csPCa and RP reference standard were used to determine specificity.

resultsBased on internal evaluation of 250 patients, a sensitivity of 0.82 (CI 0.75 to 0.87) and specificity of 0.43 (CI 0.32 to 0.55) was reached for ISUP ≥ 2. For ISUP ≥ 3, this was 0.90 (CI 0.83-0.95) and 0.39 (CI 0.31-0.47). In the external evaluation of 77 patients, the sensitivity for ISUP ≥ 2 was 0.81 (CI 0.65-0.90), with a specificity of 0.42 (CI 0.28-0.57). For ISUP ≥ 3, this was 0.96 (CI 0.78-0.99) and 0.42 (CI 0.30-0.55).

conclusionsThe AI model based on 3D mpUS showed consistent patient-level performance for csPCa detection in internal and external evaluation, comparable to voxel-level analysis. These suggest strong generalizability and support prospective clinical trials.

trial registrationNCT04605276. KEY POINTS: Question Does the diagnostic performance of a 3D multiparametric ultrasound-based AI model translate from voxel-level training to patient-level biopsy simulation? Findings Simulated biopsy performance aligned with voxel-level results, showing robust csPCa detection and supporting the model's generalizability across independent datasets. Clinical relevance The AI model's consistent biopsy simulation performance confirms its readiness for clinical evaluation and suggests diagnostic value in MRI-constrained settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage-Guided BiopsyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedProstateSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyArtificial intelligenceContrast enhanced ultrasoundFull mount prostatectomy histopathologyMultiparametric ultrasoundProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID41196365
PMCPMC13035562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.