ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Paper Matters: Technical Evaluation of Paper-Based Substrates for Enhanced Preconcentration of Biomolecules in Liquid Biopsy Diagnostics.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An automated endpoint control platform for a cyclone concentration pipette.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026Article
- Efficient fabrication of paper-based microfluidic biosensors incorporating laser-induced graphene for label-free electrochemical immunoassays.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Biosensors for Circular RNA Profiling in Biological Matrices.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of disease biomarkers remains a major challenge due to their low abundance in biological fluids. Preconcentration strategies can address this issue, but conventional approaches often require additional time, costly materials, or complex instrumentation. This work explores the use of paper-based substrates as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative for analyte preconcentration, highlighting how the choice of paper type critically influences sensitivity enhancement in analytical methods without compromising simplicity. Three cellulose-based papers (Whatman grade 1, Whatman grade 4, and a commercial laboratory filter paper) were systematically characterized and configured as 3D-origami-inspired, capillary-driven platforms. Their structural and fluidic properties were evaluated to determine how substrate selection affects analyte accumulation, transport, and detection efficiency. The devices were combined with three detection assays: a naked-eye colorimetric assay with smartphone integration, an electrochemical assay for miRNA, and a spectrophotometric Bradford assay for protein quantification. The paper platforms demonstrated rapid and efficient preconcentration across multiple biomarker classes. Up to a 20-fold enhancement was achieved for miRNA detection in human serum within 30 s, approximately 10-fold for short and double-stranded DNA in buffer, and about 2-fold for larger proteins. These results illustrate the importance of substrate selection and the versatility of paper-based preconcentration in handling analytes of different molecular sizes and assay formats. This study shows that cost-effective, customizable paper substrates can bridge the gap between high-performance biomolecular analysis and accessible diagnostics, enabling early disease detection and real-time monitoring in both laboratory and point-of-care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.