ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2025
Deep Learning R-Wave Detection for Electrocardiographic Gating in Cardiac MRI.
Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To measure the frequency of electrocardiographic (ECG) gating errors and to assess whether convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can reduce such errors. Materials and Methods ECG tracings from 120 patients who underwent cine cardiac MRI at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, along with an external dataset of ECG tracings from 47 patients, were retrospectively collected (August 2022-April 2023). The frequency of arrhythmias and ECG-gating errors was determined by manual annotation of R waves. A CNN was developed for R-wave detection using data from 79 MRI and six external patients; the remaining data were used for testing. CNN performance was compared using signal processing algorithms, including vectorcardiographic (VCG) gating and the Hamilton algorithm. Results The mean age of the 120 patients undergoing cardiac MRI was 53.7 years ± 19.8 (SD), with 72 male patients. ECG-gating errors were observed in 8.1% of patients at 1.5 T and 15.2% at 3.0 T. At 1.5 T, CNN achieved a higher F1 score (99.1%) than did VCG (98.1%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.