Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41196131›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

The Preferred Retinal Locus for Reading in Central Vision Loss.

Arda Fidanci, Colin S Flowers, Christian Larson, Stephen A Engel, Gordon E Legge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Developments in Research to Make the World Better for People with Low Vision.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arda FidanciDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Colin S FlowersDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Christian LarsonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Stephen A EngelDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Gordon E LeggeDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

PSYCHOPHYSICS OF READING: NORMAL AND LOW VISIONR01EY002934 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LEGGE, GORDON E · 1985 to 2018
$5.8M
Remapping the Visual Field to Aid Reading with Central ScotomasR01EY030890 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ENGEL, STEPHEN A., KOOZEKANANI, DARA · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002934NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: People with central vision loss (CVL) often adopt a preferred retinal locus (PRL) for fixation outside the region of central loss. However, it is unknown how often the fixational PRL (fPRL) is used in reading. Here, we assessed if the reading PRL is in the same location as the fPRL. Methods: Participants read text on a computer screen. Reading was randomly interrupted by blanking the screen, and participants reported the word being read when the blanking occurred. The location of this word was compared to the fPRL location, measured with an eye tracker. If reading uses the fPRL, the two locations should overlap. We validated our method with 10 normally sighted controls for whom the fPRL and reading PRL should coincide at the fovea. We then tested 20 participants with CVL. Results: Control participants reported the word at the fPRL, or the next word, in 77.03% of trials. Participants with CVL reported the word at the fPRL, or the next word, on 70.45% of trials. Seventeen reported the word at the fPRL most frequently. Two reported the word to the right of the PRL most frequently, possibly due to a look-ahead strategy. One reported the word to the left of the fPRL most frequently, the target of many regressive saccades. Only one participant with CVL used a reading PRL remote from the fPRL, consistently reporting the word 2 degrees below the fPRL. Conclusions: Most of the participants with CVL in our sample used a reading PRL in close proximity to their fixation PRL.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularReadingRetinaScotomaVisual FieldsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41196131
PMCPMC12599517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.