ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2025
Exploring Undergraduates' Attitudes Toward Sterilization as Contraception in the Northeastern United States: A Brief Report.
Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Undergraduates' Attitudes Toward Sterilization as Contraception in the Northeastern United States: A Brief Report.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study analyzed young adults' understanding of and thoughts about permanent contraception amidst increased demand for sterilization in this population following changes in abortion and contraception access in the United States (US).
methodsUndergraduate students at a northeastern US university (N = 53) completed an online questionnaire assessing opinions about sterilization and factors they believed physicians should consider before performing sterilization. Quantitative analysis explored whether attitudes toward vasectomy versus tubal ligation differed by capacity to become pregnant. We used inductive thematic analysis to interpret qualitative data.
resultsThere were no differences in attitudes toward sterilization methods by capacity to become pregnant. However, participants estimated posttubal ligation regret would be significantly more prevalent than postvasectomy regret. Key qualitative themes included patient-centered care, regret, and sociocultural influences.
conclusionsThis study revealed young adults value bodily autonomy in reproductive choices, regardless of permanence or potential regret, factors some providers weigh heavily. Whether interest in sterilization among this population increases or remains static, it is important for healthcare providers to be aware of these attitudes when handling requests from younger adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.