ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2025
Secretory breast carcinoma: morphologic and molecular heterogeneity with indicators of aggressive potential in a cohort of 29 cases.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mammary secretory carcinoma in a female domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): histopathological and immunohistochemical features.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Secretory carcinoma of the breast: a report of six cases with different immunophenotypes and molecular subtypes.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Pan-TRK expression and NTRK gene aberrations in meningiomas: association with tumor grade and proliferative activity.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) is a rare tumour defined by ETV6-NTRK3 rearrangement, but its clinicopathological spectrum and potential for aggressive behaviour remain incompletely characterised. We retrospectively reviewed 29 SBCs diagnosed between 2014 and 2024, including 28 females and one male aged 12-63 years (median 44). Twenty-eight tumours arose in the breast parenchyma and one in axillary accessory breast tissue. Histologically, microcystic and tubular patterns predominated and carcinoma in situ was common. Most tumours were nuclear grade 1 with rare mitoses (0-1/10 high-power fields, HPF). A single patient with distant metastasis harboured a solid-predominant tumour showing nuclear grade 2-3, brisk mitoses (6/10 HPF), and multifocal necrosis. All tumours demonstrated diffuse S100 and pan-TRK expression. Oestrogen and/or progesterone receptor staining was observed in 16 of 29 cases (2-30% of tumour cells), and all were HER2 negative or low (0-1+). Ki-67 ranged from 3% to 20% (mean 7%). Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was positive in 17 of 17 tested tumours (14 ETV6-NTRK3 dual-fusion; 3 NTRK3 break-apart). In the metastatic case, RNA sequencing confirmed canonical ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, while targeted DNA sequencing identified additional variants of uncertain significance (VUS) - RANBP2 p.S1843R, NUP107 p.K382Q, NCOR1 p.A1947V (missense), and PREX2 p.G606G (synonymous). All patients underwent surgery, and 14 received adjuvant chemotherapy. During follow-up ranging from 6 to 135 months (median 76), one patient developed lung metastasis and was alive with disease at 88 months; the remaining 28 patients were alive without recurrence or metastasis. In summary, SBC is typically indolent and characterised by ETV6-NTRK3 rearrangement with diffuse pan-TRK/S100 positivity. A solid-predominant pattern with increased cytological atypia, mitotic activity, and necrosis may indicate aggressive potential. Routine NTRK testing supports diagnosis and may help identify patients who could benefit from TRK-inhibitor therapy in advanced disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.