Observational studyJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2026
Utilising the diagnostic criteria of paediatric feeding disorder: Updated findings from a population-based cohort study.
Observational study in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of the new French ORALQUEST scale for evaluating feeding difficulties in young children.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Observational
- Utilising the diagnostic criteria of paediatric feeding disorder: Updated findings from a population-based cohort study.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPaediatric feeding disorder (PFD) is highly prevalent but frequently underdiagnosed in the United Kingdom. Existing diagnostic criteria provide a valuable framework for identifying and managing PFD. However, inconsistent use of these criteria results in under-reporting of prevalence and presentation. This study aims to expand current clinical evidence and evaluate the diagnostic framework to better reflect the real-world prevalence of PFD in United Kingdom practice. By reviewing and applying these criteria, we aim to enhance diagnostic accuracy, support early identification and improve care implementation.
methodsThis observational cohort study enrolled 51 patients with PFD. Patients were examined against the current PFD diagnostic criteria and characterised according to the four areas of impairment for diagnosis of PFD, identifying the prevalence of medical, nutritional, psychosocial and feeding skill conditions.
resultsThe most prominent clinical features in patients with PFD were medical and skill-based. All PFD patients had conditions associated with skill-based difficulties; 96% presented with a medical condition, 51% had a psychosocial condition, and 20% had a diagnosed nutritional deficiency. There was a high incidence of multiple, co-occurring conditions.
conclusionThis is the first study to report the high prevalence of skill-based deficits in PFD, along with the type and frequency of clinical features observed in affected patients. Based on these findings, we propose a clarification of the diagnostic criteria, with greater emphasis on medical and skill-based factors. This study underscores the importance of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary assessment of feeding, incorporating a thorough evaluation of feeding skills and the functional impact of medical conditions on feeding development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.