Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41195479›Full record

GuidelineDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025

Clinical Practice Guideline: Colorectal Cancer—Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention, and Long-Term Follow-Up Care.

Matthias Philip Ebert, Stefanie Reichermeier, Lars Klug, Petra Lynen Jansen, Christian Pox

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07708415 (Postoperative Endoscopic Polyp Recurrence Correlation With Pathological Status Classification of Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07708415 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Postoperative Endoscopic Polyp Recurrence Correlation With Pathological Status Classification of Colorectal Cancer: a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Open-label Study

TypeobservationalSponsorGansu Provincial HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled3,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer, PolypsArmsEndoscopic polypectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthias Philip Ebert
Stefanie Reichermeier
Lars Klug
Petra Lynen Jansen
Christian Pox

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 24 000 people die of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Germany each year. New developments in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment are improving long-term outcomes. These measures have been incorporated in the updated guideline and are presented here along with the findings of other new randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsA systematic search (2022–2023) was conducted for guidelines, reviews/meta-analyses, and primary studies (search term “colorectal cancer”; databases: international guideline registries, PubMed, Cochrane). 123 reviews were identified, evaluated, and used in the creation of the guideline.

resultsEarly detection is performed with colonoscopy every 10 years, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, or an immunological stool test for occult blood every 1–2 years; it can lower cancer-related mortality by up to 30%. Hereditary forms (Lynch syndrome, polyposis) require more intensive monitoring. All diagnosed cases must be presented to a tumor board. In the case of low-risk pT1 carcinoma, extended resection is not indicated after complete endoscopic removal. In a recent RCT, the recurrence rate was lower after robotic surgery than after laparoscopy (3-year recurrence rate 1.6% and 4.0% respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval: [0.19; 0.80]). Treatment of patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancers with checkpoint inhibitors yields response above 90%. Further systemic therapies are based on the molecular tumor profile (dMMR/MSI-H, RAS, and BRAF). Organ sparing management may be an option for rectal cancer patients in complete remission after neoadjuvant therapy; however, this requires close follow-up monitoring.

conclusionThe efficacy of early detection is undisputed. Less evidence is available concerning the optimal level of intensity of follow-up care. The clinical and molecular stratification of tumors enables differential treatment. Organ-preserving strategies after a complete response to therapy are an important area of current research.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAftercareEarly Detection of CancerGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41195479
PMCPMC12947252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.