Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41195423›Full record

ArticleGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2025

Social skills in future dental students - a project report.

Johanna Hissbach, Sinikka Heisler, Oana Gröne, Stefanie Pfisterer-Heise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna HissbachUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Sinikka HeislerGerman Sport University Cologne, Germany.
Oana GröneUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Stefanie Pfisterer-HeiseUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The doctor-patient interaction is essential for successfull dental treatment. Although it is possible to consider social skills during student selection, these are rarely taken into account. The described project aims to identify and evaluate the social skills deemed necessary by various stakeholders and to assess whether these skills can be effectively measured using a Situational Judgment Test (SJT). Methods: The project involved conducting interviews with stakeholders (lecturers, students, patients, practicing dentists) to identify relevant social skills. This was followed by a Delphi survey to evaluate the importance of these skills. Additionally, the SJT was examined for its suitability in the context of dental medicine, and various methods for reliably measuring the identified skills were assessed. Results: Dental lecturers and students consider emotional resilience, particularly stress management, to be especially important during dental studies, while patient-related behaviors are of lesser priority - possibly due to the constraints of the academic environment. In contrast, patients and dentists emphasize the importance of helpfulness and caring conduct during treatment. Conclusion: Our research highlights the need to strengthen social skills in dental education. Although the SJT from general medicine is also suitable for dental studies, Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) are a more effective method for capturing complex skills, such as behavioral flexibility.

Indexed as

Dentist-Patient RelationsEducation, DentalSocial SkillsStudents, DentalAdultDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaledentistryinterviewsSituational Judgment Testsocial competencestudent selection

Identifiers

PMID41195423
PMCPMC12584161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.