ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
The impact of electronic product use on children with tic disorders and ADHD, and management strategies: a review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pervasive use of electronic products raises significant neurodevelopmental concerns for children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Tic Disorders (TDs), a vulnerable population particularly susceptible to the negative impacts of electronic products and at higher risk for problematic usage patterns. The clinical management of this issue is challenged by an incomplete understanding of the impact mechanisms. A review of the literature reveals these effects are complex and primarily functional, affecting systems like dopamine and executive functions, rather than causing widespread organic brain damage. Since the severity of the impact varies and absolute prohibition is often not the best approach, scientific management that focuses on content, duration, and usage patterns is essential. Specific, well-managed digital content may even have neutral or beneficial effects. Therefore, the paradigm for managing electronic product use must shift from simplistic restriction to scientific guidance and individualized strategies. This review offers an evidence-based framework to help clinicians tailor advice for each child's developmental profile, moving beyond generic restrictions to foster healthy development in the digital age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.