Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41195325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025

Enhancing drug-target interaction prediction with graph representation learning and knowledge-based regularization.

Qihuan Yao, Zhen Chen, Ye Cao, Huijing Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qihuan Yao *Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kongjiang Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Zhen Chen *Department of Medical Laboratory, Shidong Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ye CaoDepartment of Geriatrics, Renhe Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Huijing HuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shidong Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurately predicting drug-target interactions (DTIs) is crucial for accelerating drug discovery and repurposing. Despite recent advances in deep learning-based methods, challenges remain in effectively capturing the complex relationships between drugs and targets while incorporating prior biological knowledge. Methods: We introduce a novel framework that combines graph neural networks with knowledge integration for DTI prediction. Our approach learns representations from molecular structures and protein sequences through a customized graph-based message passing scheme. We integrate domain knowledge from biomedical ontologies and databases using a knowledge-based regularization strategy to infuse biological context into the learned representations. Results: We evaluated our model on multiple benchmark datasets, achieving an average AUC of 0.98 and an average AUPR of 0.89, surpassing existing state-of-the-art methods by a considerable margin. Visualization of learned attention weights identified salient molecular substructures and protein motifs driving the predicted interactions, demonstrating model interpretability. Discussion: We validated the practical utility by predicting novel DTIs for FDA-approved drugs and experimentally confirming a high proportion of predictions. Our framework offers a powerful and interpretable solution for DTI prediction with the potential to substantially accelerate the identification of new drug candidates and therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

computational drug screeningdrug discoverydrug-target predictionrepresentation learningSystems pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID41195325
PMCPMC12583218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.