Trial reportCanadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD2025
Uncovering evidence: Transitioning from face-to-face to online learning.
Trial report in Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a need for evidence-based choices when integrating innovative teaching technologies into dental hygiene and dentistry education. Examining both the direct and indirect effects of these technologies can help to inform and enhance teaching practices. The aim of this study was to compare traditional lectures with online modules tailored to diverse learning style preferences, exploring how these approaches influence student engagement, retention, and recall. Methods: Second-year dental hygiene and first-year dentistry students were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 teaching conditions (in-person lecture, online lecture) in a common communications course. Baseline measures of content achievement, Edmonds learning style preferences, and comfort levels with learning online and in-person were recorded prior to the lecture using the pre-lecture assessment survey. Students completed post-lecture assessments immediately after the lecture and again 6 months later. Results: Regardless of the teaching condition, students showed significant improvement in their academic performance compared to the baseline measures. Their learning style preferences were found to be linked with higher engagement levels, a sense of accomplishment, and control over their learning environment. Conclusions: Teaching health sciences students presents challenges, especially when transitioning from traditional in-person classes to online learning, which may lack engagement for some. Accommodating diverse learning style preferences is crucial for maximizing technology's benefits in education and enhancing learning outcomes. A blended approach, combining face-to-face and online lectures, can optimize student learning experiences, emphasizing the importance of considering varied preferences in educational strategies, particularly in the post-pandemic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41195322PMC12584924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.