ReviewCanadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD2025
Application of large language models in oral health education: a review of the literature.
Review in Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Credibility of ChatGPT on Temporomandibular Disorders.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
- Comparative assessment of quality, consistency, and reference accuracy of MIH-related clinical information generated by ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek R1.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The recent emergence of artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs) has caused educators to be cautious about applying these technologies in education. This narrative review explores the current literature to identify the existing applications of LLMs in dental and dental hygiene education. Methods: An extensive literature search in PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and Education Research Complete was conducted. The search string was (((Large language model) OR (Chatbot)) OR (ChatGPT)) AND (Dental education)). Primary research articles published in English and relevant to the research questions were included. Articles were screened by title and then by full-text review. Data were extracted from the eligible studies. Results: After 2 rounds of screening, 28 articles were selected for review. The LLMs used in the studies were ChatGPT versions 3, 3.5, 4, 4o, 4V; Bing Chat; Bard; Gemini; Copilot; Llama 2; Claude3-Opus and custom chatbots developed by the authors. Data analysis revealed 2 major themes in the research: 1) the performance of LLMs on standardized exams and 2) LLMs as teaching tools. Discussion: Many studies reported that LLMs can pass high-stakes dental exams, raising concerns about current assessment methods. However, findings that LLMs perform poorly in critically appraising literature and interpretation-type questions are insightful for educators when designing new assignments and assessment plans for dental and dental hygiene students. Conclusion: LLMs are rapidly developing as artificial intelligence advances. Repeated studies are needed to assess the impact of LLMs on teaching, learning, and assessment experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41195319PMC12584927What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.