ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Neural network dynamics underlying the bottom-up perception and top-down regulation processes of empathy.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contemporary theoretical models of empathy propose that it involves both bottom-up perception and top-down regulation processes. Although previous studies have explored brain regions involved in empathy, direct evidence for a hierarchical organization in empathy processing remains limited. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we sought to address this gap by using positive, negative, and neutral stimuli to explore whether shared or valence-specific processing underlies positive and negative empathy. Our results indicate that the bottom-up perception process involves the bilateral triangular part of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFGtri) and the superior temporal sulcus (STS), with the IFGtri initiating information flow to the STS. Moreover, while bilateral IFGtri only shows excitatory effects on bilateral STS, bilateral STS only shows inhibitory effects on bilateral IFGtri. The right IFGtri appears to be more involved in external information processing, whereas the left IFGtri focuses more on internal information communication. The top-down regulation process involves information flow from the left dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus (dlSFG) to the medial prefrontal gyrus (mPFC), and then to the precuneus. Moreover, positive stimuli show an inhibitory effect from dlSFG to mPFC and from mPFC to precuneus, whereas negative stimuli only inhibit the flow from mPFC to precuneus. This finding suggests that more regulatory neural mechanisms occur to others' positive emotions than negative ones. In conclusion, our study provides direct evidence of a hierarchical neural network supporting theoretical models of empathy, offering novel insights into how bottom-up perception and top-down regulation processes are instantiated in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.