ArticleGeoHealth2025
Modeling the Burden of Extreme Weather Events in a Large Network of International HIV Care Cohorts.
Article in GeoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Documenting HIV service delivery and adoption of evidence-based practices in HIV care programs: A protocol for a cross-sectional survey of HIV clinics participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Modeling the Burden of Extreme Weather Events in a Large Network of International HIV Care Cohorts.GeoHealth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extreme weather events (EWEs) continue to threaten the health and well-being of populations across the globe. However, risk from drought and floods is not evenly distributed spatially nor are all populations equally at risk for poor health outcomes. Globally, people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV) face a particular set of challenges with EWE exposure including increased susceptibility to disease progression from care disruptions and medication adherence, and general population concentration in areas where rainfall is both highly variable and key to economic well-being. To mitigate the impacts of EWE exposure on PLHIV, it is necessary to understand the historical EWE exposure patterns at HIV care clinics. In this paper, we link open-source measures of drought and flood events to clinic locations from the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) network, a longitudinal study of over 2 million people living with and at risk for HIV in 44 different countries around the globe enrolling in HIV care from 2006 to present. Using generalized additive models fit to clinic-level drought and flood exposures, we show how exposures vary across and within countries, model each clinic's probability of exposure to a drought or flood to identify high-risk areas, and describe how this historical exposure record could ultimately be used to identify at-risk populations for a wide variety of study designs. While EWEs occurred at HIV care clinics around the globe, we found that clinic locations in Southern Africa are particularly vulnerable to flood and drought events as compared to other IeDEA clinic regions and locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.