ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Influence of surface wettability on electrostatic fog collection efficiency using polytetrafluoroethylene-coated carbon papers.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of surface wettability on electrostatic fog collection efficiency using polytetrafluoroethylene-coated carbon papers.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrostatic fog collection offers a low energy cost and highly efficient method for fog collection; however, the correlation between efficiency and collector surface wettability has not yet been fully explored. This study examines the effectiveness of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated carbon papers in electrostatic fog collection and reveals that their performance is comparable to that of hydrophilic carbon papers. These findings suggest that PTFE coating on the carbon paper surface has a minimal influence on the electrostatic fog collection efficiency. On hydrophilic carbon paper, deposited fog droplets coalesce into a continuous water film that subsequently drains, whereas on hydrophobic carbon paper, the droplets aggregate into discrete spherical forms. This variation in wetting behaviour exerts nearly no influence on the overall fog collection efficiency. Furthermore, the efficiency of electrostatic fog collection is unaffected by charge polarity, with both negative and positive high voltages yielding comparable fog collection efficiencies. Collection efficiency is directly correlated with electrostatic current and shows an exponential relationship: collection efficiency rises sharply with increasing current before reaching a near-plateau. In addition, a thermal camera was utilized to map the zone where the fog stream is collected on the carbon paper, and it was shown that a strong electric field could cause segregation of the charged fog stream.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.