ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Challenges in assessing bone health in early infancy: a narrative review of existing technologies.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Femoral Skeletal Growth in Early Infancy Assessed by Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2026Article
- Postpartum timing of teriparatide initiation and BMD response in pregnancy- and lactation-associated osteoporosis: an observational study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, no shared guidelines have been approved for the diagnosis and management of low bone mineral density (BMD), especially in early infancy. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for new methodologies to allow the assessment of bone health status in this specific cohort, which is exposed to several risk factors (e.g. maternal vitamin D deficiency, pregnancy-associated diseases, preterm birth and comorbidities, low birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction). Currently, the assessment of BMD in newborn and infants relies mainly on serum and urinary biochemical markers, in association with several technologies to measure bone mineral content, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) being traditionally used, despite many limitations. More recently, Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) emerged as a promising tool in clinical practice for screening and monitoring BMD. Due to the radiation-free technology, an extremely ease of use, low costs, an excellent degree of sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility, REMS technology has proven to be the gold standard technique in sensitive populations such as pregnant women, newborns and infants, allowing mass extended screening strategies. However, to date no validate cut-off reference for REMS in paediatric age are available. Future longitudinal studies on REMS methodology are needed to build reference standards and new shared algorithms, combining biochemical and instrumental data, for the diagnosis, management and treatment of decreased BMD before and after birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.