ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
A psycholinguistic NLP framework for forensic text analysis of deception and emotion.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psycholinguistics is an interdisciplinary area of research that bridges elements of linguistics with various branches of psychology. One of its goals is to identify and explain the links that exist between our psyche and the language we speak. In this research, we are expanding upon previous research that we did using several different Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to identify persons of interest from a scenario that was generated by a large language model (LLM). We used a different approach to this topic, which allowed us to develop a more nuanced method of reverse engineering and breaking down the psycholinguistic features of each suspect. Through the application of n-grams paired with deception, emotion, and subjectivity over time, we were able to identify and measure cues that can be used to better identify persons of interest from a larger pool of candidates. That dataset was smaller and somewhat limited in scope. We successfully identified the guilty parties from the fictional murder case using a combination of Latent Dirichlet Allocation, word vectors, and pairwise correlations. This research was larger in scope, number of potential suspects, and in the diversity of the corpus used. We were able to determine the guilty parties identified in ground truth using our methodology in this case specifically by focusing on entity to topic correlation, deception detection, and emotion analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.