Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41195198›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

A psycholinguistic NLP framework for forensic text analysis of deception and emotion.

Jonathan Adkins, Ali Al Bataineh, Anthos Khanal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan AdkinsSenator Patrick Leahy School of Cybersecurity and Advanced Computing, Norwich University, Northfield, VT, United States.
Ali Al BatainehArtificial Intelligence Center, Norwich University, Northfield, VT, United States.
Anthos KhanalArtificial Intelligence Center, Norwich University, Northfield, VT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psycholinguistics is an interdisciplinary area of research that bridges elements of linguistics with various branches of psychology. One of its goals is to identify and explain the links that exist between our psyche and the language we speak. In this research, we are expanding upon previous research that we did using several different Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to identify persons of interest from a scenario that was generated by a large language model (LLM). We used a different approach to this topic, which allowed us to develop a more nuanced method of reverse engineering and breaking down the psycholinguistic features of each suspect. Through the application of n-grams paired with deception, emotion, and subjectivity over time, we were able to identify and measure cues that can be used to better identify persons of interest from a larger pool of candidates. That dataset was smaller and somewhat limited in scope. We successfully identified the guilty parties from the fictional murder case using a combination of Latent Dirichlet Allocation, word vectors, and pairwise correlations. This research was larger in scope, number of potential suspects, and in the diversity of the corpus used. We were able to determine the guilty parties identified in ground truth using our methodology in this case specifically by focusing on entity to topic correlation, deception detection, and emotion analysis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecriminologydigital forensicsnatural language processingsentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID41195198
PMCPMC12582947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.