ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Varix of the vortex vein ampulla: a case report and imaging correlation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Varicosity of Vortex Vein Ampulla in Ocular Fundus: Descriptive Series of 53 Patients and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We report a case of varix of the vortex vein ampulla (VVVA) in the right eye. VVVA is relatively rare and often presents as a fundus mass-like lesion during clinical examination, making it easily confused with choroidal tumors. This case report aims to improve ophthalmologists' understanding of this rare lesion and provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and management. Case presentation: A 29-year-old male presented with 1 month of decreased vision in the right eye. His best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20. B-scan ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed a choroidal space-occupying lesion. Fundus examination identified a deep red elevated mass at the inferotemporal VVVA of the right eye. Further indocyanine green (ICG) angiography confirmed VVVA. The mass became more prominent when the patient gazed downward with the right eye. After applying pressure to the eye, follow-up B-scan and OCT showed the mass had disappeared or reduced-findings that strongly confirmed the lesion was VVVA rather than a choroidal tumor. Conclusion: VVVA is an uncommon condition. This case reminds ophthalmologists to consider less common causes when evaluating choroidal mass-like lesions. Accurate diagnosis of VVVA is critical to avoid misdiagnosis as a choroidal tumor and unnecessary invasive testing or treatment. Recognition of this benign condition can prevent misdiagnosis as a choroidal tumor and unnecessary invasive testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.