ArticleJournal of nursing management2025
Examining the Relationship Between Differing Implementation Patterns of an Evidence-Informed Frontline Nursing Care Model and Implementation Success in a National-Level Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The Clinical Nurse Leader (CNL) care model, which is increasingly being adopted by health systems across the United States and abroad, is a different way of organizing frontline nursing care delivery, in contrast to traditional "staff nurse ratio" models. However, variability in implementation and outcomes has been noted across health settings. Aim: A psychometrically validated CNL care model survey instrument operationalizes a complex implementation pathway that leads to improved care quality outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify implementation patterns in 66 clinical units across 9 hospitals in 5 states and examine their relation to implementation success. Methods: The survey was administered between 2016 and 2019 to a national sample of administrators/clinicians involved in CNL care model implementation. The survey measures presence of the five domains of the model and implementation success. We analyzed the complex hierarchical structure of the data using a Bayesian framework. Results: 1265 participants responded, and 1223 (97%) provided success and rating scores. The analysis estimated CNL care model elements best discriminating between lower and higher implementation success. Outcome domain survey item scores were most consistently predictive of implementation success. In terms of Readiness and Structuring and CNL Practice, discrete patterns emerged, suggesting efficacious pathways toward improved care environments and care quality. Conclusions: Findings describe specific CNL care model organizational readiness and unit-level workflow implementation patterns that drive CNL practices and the production of expected outcomes, including positive work environments. The research provides actionable implementation and outcome evidence about a different way to organize nursing knowledge and practice into a care model that can be successfully adopted within real-world healthcare settings to achieve improved care environments and higher quality patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.