ArticleCase reports in neurological medicine2025
Discoblock-Associated Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in neurological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discoblock procedure entails the administration of an anesthetic agent during discography to pinpoint the origin of spinal pain in challenging diagnostic scenarios. Known for its minimal complication rate, the most frequently documented adverse effect is discitis. This case report introduces a novel observation of subarachnoid hemorrhage following a discoblock procedure. Initially presenting with persistent lower back pain, the patient exhibited dehydrated lumbar discs on imaging, characterized by altered T2 signal intensity and a diffuse disc bulge impacting the anterior thecal sac at the L4-5 level, alongside degenerative scoliosis at L2-3. These findings suggested the potential origins of symptoms at L4-5 or L2-3, leading to the decision to proceed with L4-5 discoblock. Symptom alleviation postdiscoblock, coupled with prophylactic cefazolin administration, indicated the necessity for further management at the L4-5 disc level. Subsequently, the patient presented with status epilepticus 9 hours later, with brain magnetic resonance imaging revealing anomalous hyperintensities in the left temporoparietal sulci and the left ambient cistern, prompting suspicion of subarachnoid hemorrhage. This study elucidates the procedural indications for discoblock, explores potential factors contributing to complications, and delves into the safety considerations surrounding this intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.