ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Effects of different preceding crops on soil properties and rhizosphere microbial community of sugar beet.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A significant challenge in sugar beet cultivation is the issue of continuous cropping cycles. The implementation of preceding crop cultivation has emerged as an effective strategy to mitigate the problems associated with continuous cropping systems. This study investigates how different preceding crops influence soil properties, microbial diversity, and community structure in the sugar beet rhizosphere, thereby establishing a theoretical foundation for addressing continuous cropping obstacles in sugar beet production. This study utilized a field experiment with four distinct preceding crop treatments-potato, oat, corn, and sunflower-prior to sugar beet cultivation. Subsequent analyses focused on sugar beet growth performance, soil chemical properties, and shifts in microbial community structure. The findings demonstrate that preceding crops significantly alter nutrient availability in sugar beet rhizosphere soil, microbial diversity, and overall crop productivity. Specifically, oat and potato stubbles substantially enhanced soil organic matter content, available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium levels, along with increased activities of alkaline phosphatase, urease, and sucrase, ultimately promoting sugar beet growth. Sunflower stubble exhibited distinct effects, notably increasing bacterial diversity while reducing fungal diversity. Across all treatments, the dominant bacterial phyla in the sugar beet rhizosphere were Firmicutes and Acidobacteria, whereas Ascomycota and Mortierellomycota prevailed among fungal communities. Importantly, sunflower stubble exerted the most pronounced influence on the relative abundance of these dominant bacterial and fungal phyla.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.