ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Deep learning-based automated quantification system for abdominal aortic calcification: multicenter cohort study for algorithm development and clinical validation.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of Physical Activity with Abdominal Aortic Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To establish an automated scoring system for abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) to facilitate standardized quantitative imaging analysis in support of clinical decision-making in atherosclerosis management. Methods: x-ray images of the abdominal aorta were obtained for 2,941 individuals from five medical centers in Zhejiang Province. Calcification severity was graded manually using the Kauppila scoring system, and cases were stratified into three groups based on total calcification burden. The automated assessment framework comprised two sequential components: a lumbar spine segmentation model based on nnUnet and an AAC score regression model based on ResNet. Model development was conducted using 1,737 training cases, with internal validation in 471 cases and external validation in 733 cases from independent centers. A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted in 200 AAC patients from Center B (100 dialysis-dependent and 100 not dialysis-dependent cases), Results: The developed automated quantification system demonstrated mean absolute errors of 1.686 (internal validation set) and 1.920 (external validation set), with strong correlation to expert ratings (Spearman's Conclusion: The established automated quantification system for AAC exhibits good assessment efficiency and measurement accuracy, offering a standardized approach to refine cardiovascular risk stratification in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.